Zara Aleena: Serious probation failings over law graduate’s killer, watchdog finds

Jordan McSweeney was considered a “violent” man and should have been classed as “high risk of serious harm” on release from prison, but he was wrongly assessed as “medium risk”.

Failings by probation officers left a sexual predator able to stalk and kill law graduate Zara Aleena – just days after he was released from jail, according to a watchdog.

A damning report found a catalogue of errors in the Probation Service’s handling of Jordan McSweeney, which meant he was not treated as a high-risk offender and was “free” to commit this “most heinous crime”.

Last month, the 29-year-old was sentenced to a minimum of 38 years for sexually assaulting and murdering the 35-year-old aspiring lawyer in Ilford, east London, on 26 June last year.

Justice Secretary Dominic Raab ordered a review of how probation staff had supervised McSweeney when it emerged he had been freed from prison on licence – where individuals are released from jail but still have a part of their sentence to serve in the community – nine days before the murder.

In the report, Chief Inspector of Probation Justin Russell said: “Jordan McSweeney should have been considered a high risk of serious harm offender. If he had, more urgent action would have been taken to recall him to prison, after he missed his supervision appointments on release from custody.

“The Probation Service failed to do so, and he was free to commit this most heinous crime on an innocent, young woman.”

In the nine days before the murder, McSweeney’s licence had been revoked after he failed to attend any meetings with probation officers, but he had not been recalled to prison.

Mr Russell said McSweeney was considered a “violent” man and “all the evidence” shows on release from prison he should have been classed as a “high risk of serious harm”.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*